Legends DeckStandingsCompare
MIL at TBWorld Series · Oct 28 · 8:00 PM ET
FinalMIL 4, TB 1
TB win chance48.8%Simulations1,000

Milwaukee Brewers at Tampa Bay Rays: Oct 28, 2026 prediction and projected box score

Oct 28, 2026 · World Series · Tropicana Field · Locked 7:40 PM ET, before first pitch. 1,000 simulations from lineups, starters and bullpen availability.

Win chance and result

PostseasonPostseason: the model was backtested on regular-season games only.
Win chance for Milwaukee Brewers at Tampa Bay Rays
SideTeamOur win chanceMarketActual runs
AMilwaukee Brewers away51.2%56.6%451.2%Market 56.6% · actual 4
HTampa Bay Rays home48.8%43.4%148.8%Market 43.4% · actual 1

Our win chance comes from a team-strength model: this season's run differential blended with last season's, the starters, the lineups and home field. Player lines and the bullpen come from simulated games. Market is the market line at lock with the bookmaker margin removed. It is shown beside ours, never as advice. Postseason games are not validated: win chance carries a flag and there is no run total or score line.

Result vs our pick

Linescore
Team123456789RHE
MIL010012000482
TB000000001140
Final totals: projected versus actual
TeamRunsHitsWalksStrikeouts
MIL48.3 84.4 19.3 10
TB18.3 43.2 18.1 6

Final: Milwaukee Brewers 4, Tampa Bay Rays 1. Our pick, Milwaukee Brewers at 51.2%, won. The projection was locked 7:40 PM ET on Oct 28, 2026, before first pitch, and has not changed since.

Winning pitcher: Jacob Misiorowski. Losing pitcher: Drew Rasmussen.

Muted numbers are projected, bold numbers are actual.

MIL projected vs actual battinglineup posted

Milwaukee Brewers projected and actual batting lines
#HitterPosPAH1+ HHR1+ HRRRBIBBKSB
1Jackson ChourioLF4.7 41.1 165% yes0.16 015% no0.62 00.53 00.3 01.1 30.18 0proj 1.1 H, actual 1 H4.7 PA · 1.1 H · 0.16 HR · 0.6 R · 0.5 RBI · 0.3 BB · 1.1 K
2Jake Bauers1B4.5 40.8 053% no0.13 012% no0.59 00.46 00.7 01.2 20.10 0proj 0.8 H, actual 0 H4.5 PA · 0.8 H · 0.13 HR · 0.6 R · 0.5 RBI · 0.7 BB · 1.2 K
3Christian YelichDH4.4 40.9 061% no0.15 014% no0.57 10.55 00.5 01.1 00.13 0proj 0.9 H, actual 0 H4.4 PA · 0.9 H · 0.15 HR · 0.6 R · 0.6 RBI · 0.5 BB · 1.1 K
4William ContrerasC4.4 40.9 155% yes0.14 013% no0.53 10.54 10.6 01.0 00.04 0proj 0.9 H, actual 1 H4.4 PA · 0.9 H · 0.14 HR · 0.5 R · 0.5 RBI · 0.6 BB · 1.0 K
5Brice Turang2B4.3 40.9 255% yes0.11 010% no0.50 10.54 00.5 01.0 10.19 1proj 0.9 H, actual 2 H4.3 PA · 0.9 H · 0.11 HR · 0.5 R · 0.5 RBI · 0.5 BB · 1.0 K
6Sal FrelickRF4.0 40.9 059% no0.10 09% no0.43 00.48 00.4 00.8 10.12 0proj 0.9 H, actual 0 H4.0 PA · 0.9 H · 0.10 HR · 0.4 R · 0.5 RBI · 0.4 BB · 0.8 K
7Cooper PrattSS4.1 40.9 260% yes0.13 012% no0.49 10.50 20.4 00.9 00.23 0proj 0.9 H, actual 2 H4.1 PA · 0.9 H · 0.13 HR · 0.5 R · 0.5 RBI · 0.4 BB · 0.9 K
8Garrett MitchellCF3.8 40.7 148% yes0.10 09% no0.43 00.40 00.5 11.0 20.11 0proj 0.7 H, actual 1 H3.8 PA · 0.7 H · 0.10 HR · 0.4 R · 0.4 RBI · 0.5 BB · 1.0 K
9David Hamilton3B3.5 40.8 151% yes0.11 010% no0.41 00.45 10.3 00.9 10.33 0proj 0.8 H, actual 1 H3.5 PA · 0.8 H · 0.11 HR · 0.4 R · 0.5 RBI · 0.3 BB · 0.9 K

Muted numbers are projected, bold numbers are actual. 1+ H and 1+ HR are the chance of at least one, then whether it happened.

TB projected vs actual battinglineup posted

Tampa Bay Rays projected and actual batting lines
#HitterPosPAH1+ HHR1+ HRRRBIBBKSB
1Yandy DíazDH4.4 41.0 061% no0.13 012% no0.58 00.43 00.4 10.9 10.01 0proj 1.0 H, actual 0 H4.4 PA · 1.0 H · 0.13 HR · 0.6 R · 0.4 RBI · 0.4 BB · 0.9 K
2Jonathan Aranda1B4.2 40.9 060% no0.16 015% no0.55 00.50 00.4 01.0 10.00 0proj 0.9 H, actual 0 H4.2 PA · 0.9 H · 0.16 HR · 0.6 R · 0.5 RBI · 0.4 BB · 1.0 K
3Junior Caminero3B4.3 41.0 163% yes0.18 017% no0.52 00.58 00.4 00.9 10.04 0proj 1.0 H, actual 1 H4.3 PA · 1.0 H · 0.18 HR · 0.5 R · 0.6 RBI · 0.4 BB · 0.9 K
4Liam HicksC4.1 40.9 155% yes0.12 011% no0.44 10.51 00.5 00.9 00.03 0proj 0.9 H, actual 1 H4.1 PA · 0.9 H · 0.12 HR · 0.4 R · 0.5 RBI · 0.5 BB · 0.9 K
5Jonny DeLucaCF4.1 41.0 062% no0.12 012% no0.43 00.50 00.2 00.9 30.18 0proj 1.0 H, actual 0 H4.1 PA · 1.0 H · 0.12 HR · 0.4 R · 0.5 RBI · 0.2 BB · 0.9 K
6Chandler SimpsonLF3.7 40.8 254% yes0.06 06% no0.34 00.35 10.2 00.7 00.26 0proj 0.8 H, actual 2 H3.7 PA · 0.8 H · 0.06 HR · 0.3 R · 0.3 RBI · 0.2 BB · 0.7 K
7Ben Williamson2B3.8 20.8 054% no0.10 09% no0.39 00.39 00.2 00.9 00.07 0proj 0.8 H, actual 0 H3.8 PA · 0.8 H · 0.10 HR · 0.4 R · 0.4 RBI · 0.2 BB · 0.9 K
8Ryan ViladeRF3.5 20.8 051% no0.12 012% no0.42 00.40 00.3 00.9 00.02 0proj 0.8 H, actual 0 H3.5 PA · 0.8 H · 0.12 HR · 0.4 R · 0.4 RBI · 0.3 BB · 0.9 K
9Taylor WallsSS3.3 30.7 047% no0.07 07% no0.38 00.29 00.4 00.8 00.15 0proj 0.7 H, actual 0 H3.3 PA · 0.7 H · 0.07 HR · 0.4 R · 0.3 RBI · 0.4 BB · 0.8 K

Muted numbers are projected, bold numbers are actual. 1+ H and 1+ HR are the chance of at least one, then whether it happened.

MIL bench bats

Milwaukee Brewers bench bats, statistical expectation
Bench batPAHHRRBIBBK
Joey Ortiz statistical0.730.190.010.060.080.10
Andrew Vaughn statistical0.560.140.000.060.060.09
Gary Sánchez statistical0.390.080.010.040.060.07
Luis Lara statistical0.230.050.000.030.040.04

Statistical, not a prediction that any one of them plays: expected pinch-hit and substitute plate appearances spread over the bench by how often each is used. Chance of at least one substitute bat: 73%; expected substitute PA 1.9.

TB bench bats

Tampa Bay Rays bench bats, statistical expectation
Bench batPAHHRRBIBBK
Cedric Mullins statistical0.460.110.010.040.060.07
Victor Mesa Jr. statistical0.430.120.010.040.050.06
Jorge Mateo statistical0.260.060.000.030.020.06
Nick Fortes statistical0.250.050.000.030.020.02
Richie Palacios statistical0.140.030.000.010.020.02

Statistical, not a prediction that any one of them plays: expected pinch-hit and substitute plate appearances spread over the bench by how often each is used. Chance of at least one substitute bat: 68%; expected substitute PA 1.5.

Starting pitchers

Projected starting pitcher lines
TeamPitcherIPKERHBBHRPitchesWin chance
MILJacob Misiorowski5.0 5.74.8 22.3 04.7 21.7 10.69 081 8634%
TBDrew Rasmussen4.5 4.04.7 42.3 14.1 22.1 00.64 078 4821%

Muted numbers are projected, bold numbers are actual. IP is outs divided by three.

MIL bullpen availability

Milwaukee Brewers bullpen availability and expected use
RolePitcherAvailabilityAppearsExp. IPActual
CLTrevor MegillFresh 86%42%0.5pitched 2.0 IP, 29 pitches
SUAaron AshbyOut 12%17%0.1did not pitch
SUShane DrohanTired 45%35%0.4did not pitch
MRAbner UribeTired 28%24%0.2pitched 0.7 IP, 10 pitches
MRAntonio SenzatelaOut 3%7%0.0did not pitch
MRKyle HarrisonFresh 100%66%0.9did not pitch
MRJoJo RomeroTired 46%43%0.6pitched 0.7 IP, 10 pitches
MRDL HallOut 22%23%0.2did not pitch
MRBrandon WoodruffOK 65%53%0.8did not pitch
Fresh 75%+OK 50-74%Tired 25-49%Out under 25%

Availability is how much of a fully rested arm's usage he gets today, from recent days of work. Roles are inferred from recent saves and holds.

TB bullpen availability

Tampa Bay Rays bullpen availability and expected use
RolePitcherAvailabilityAppearsExp. IPActual
CLBryan BakerTired 46%34%0.6pitched 1.0 IP, 7 pitches
SUKevin KellyTired 47%48%0.8pitched 0.7 IP, 17 pitches
SUCole SulserOK 53%61%0.8did not pitch
MRCam BooserOut 9%16%0.1did not pitch
MRSteven MatzOK 55%66%1.0pitched 1.3 IP, 18 pitches
MRIan SeymourOut 9%17%0.1pitched 1.0 IP, 8 pitches
MRTyler WellsOut 2%8%0.0pitched 0.7 IP, 14 pitches
MRGarrett CleavingerFresh 77%77%1.1pitched 0.3 IP, 8 pitches
Fresh 75%+OK 50-74%Tired 25-49%Out under 25%

Availability is how much of a fully rested arm's usage he gets today, from recent days of work. Roles are inferred from recent saves and holds.

Why the model leans this way

  • Home field: 4.4 points for TB.
  • Team strength: 5.1 points for MIL (this season's run differential blended with last season's).
  • Lineups: 0.1 points for MIL.
  • Starting pitchers: 0.4 points for MIL (J. Misiorowski over D. Rasmussen).

Starting from 50-50, these add up to MIL 51.2%. Points are percentage points of home win chance.

Fresh relievers expected available: MIL 2.7, TB 2.2.

SourcesEvery number here is a model estimate. Anything we do not have is left blank, never filled with zeros.